For Medical & Scientific Affairs

Evidence briefings built for MLR review

Transform publications into compliance-constrained briefings with claim-level language enforcement, do-not-say rules, and an audit trail built for Medical, Legal, and Regulatory review. Optional audio for between-meeting MSL prep.

Get Started FreeHear a Sample

The MSL Briefing Problem

Your team reviews dozens of publications per therapeutic area, per quarter. Each one needs to be distilled into something an MSL can confidently present in the field — with language that holds up under compliance review.

Generic AI summaries fail here. They produce fluent text that sounds authoritative but conflates association with causation, uses promotional language, and leaves no audit trail. One "breakthrough" in a field briefing and you have a compliance incident.

Manual summarisation is rigorous but slow. A single evidence briefing can take hours when you factor in claim-level assessment, language review, and internal sign-off.

The average Medical Affairs team reviews 200+ publications per year. At 2-3 hours per briefing, that is 400-600 hours of summarisation work annually.

How Ordestra Helps

Claim-Level Enforcement

Study design determines what can be claimed. An RCT supports causal language. An observational study supports association only. These boundaries are built into the system — the AI works within them, not around them.

Do-Not-Say Rules

Standard pharma compliance vocabulary is enforced on every output. "Breakthrough", "cure", "game-changing", "proven", "safe" without evidence — all flagged and prevented before the summary reaches your team.

Audit-Ready Badge

10 compliance checks run on every output: claim level, claim preservation, attribution accuracy, do-not-say, implied causation, grounding, and more. The badge shows what passed and what needs your eye.

Hear It

This is what an evidence-constrained summary sounds like. Notice the claim-level language, the attribution pattern, and the structured limitations section.

Nutrition therapy & survival in head and neck cancer

Belak et al., Frontiers in Oncology, 2025 · 90s preview

0:000:00

10 Compliance Checks on Every Output

Every Ordestra summary runs through a deterministic verification pipeline before delivery. Hard failures block the output and trigger a retry. Soft warnings are surfaced for your review.

Claim LevelStudy design matches claim language
Claim PreservationAll finding sentences preserved verbatim
Attribution AccuracyAuthor, journal, year cited correctly
Do-Not-SayBanned promotional terms blocked
Implied CausationAssociation language not inflated
Factual GroundingNo fabricated claims or statistics
Length ComplianceOutput matches requested duration
Audience GateTier-appropriate content only
LLM FactualAI-verified against source paper
GroundingEvery assertion traces to the source

Ready to start?

Pro gives you 60 credits/month, full commercial use, domain add-ons, and attribution mode — built for Medical Affairs teams.

See all plans →

3 free credits. No card required.

Generate your first evidence-constrained summary in under two minutes.

Get Started FreeHear a Sample